Whereas I think the way that I and ialdabaoth are using the idea of "enthusiastic consent", it is (in part) about being unambiguous.

The problem is that you haven't actually defined standards for "enthusiastic consent" and near as I can tell neither have any of the other people arguing for it. It's not enough to simply assert that something should be unambiguous. Since the property of being unambiguous is itself ambiguous.

I'm curious if you have a substantive response to the rest of that comment, by the way.

As for your accusations of narrative bias, the same could be said about the existence of this supposed "rape culture".