LW jargon. Neither Asimov nor the intended audience would necessarily make that distinction.

The jargon introduction was yours, not Asimov's or mine and your interpretation of his advice to be telling to people to ignore ethical injunctions is uncharitable as a reading of his intent and mistaken as a claim about the how the LW concept applies.

Not really once you consider where said intuitions come from.

Yes, really. I don't know what you are basing this 'consideration' on.

An example of following Asimov's advice would be someone with strong moral sense that homosexuality is wrong but a strong egalitarian philosophy choosing to overcome the moral sense and refusing to stone the homosexual to death despite the instinctive and socially reinforced moral revulsion.