= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
bogdanb comments on To reduce astronomical waste: take your time, then go very fast - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (50)
Gas pressure at rest is also proportional to the number of molecules. (PV=nRT) Which at constant volume and known composition basically means mass, i.e. how much gas you’re hitting, which does matter.
That said, I still don’t get the exact calculation, so I’m not sure that it’s correct reasoning.
My argument is typical physicist fare - note that the answer has a spurious dependence, therefore it's wrong. That it also has one of the right dependences wouldn't matter.
I was off on what the implied steps in the derivation were, so it didn't have the problem I described.
At the interstellar temperatures (2.7K or so) the ideal gas pressure has negligible contribution to the kinetic friction at near-light speeds. The situation is somewhat different for photon gas, where pressure is always large, of the order of density * speed of light^2, not density * RT. But in the end it does not matter, since the CMB density is much much less than the dust density even in the intergalactic space.
OK, I got it, I think. I was confused both about the question and the answer :-)