Larks comments on Open Thread, June 2-15, 2013 - Less Wrong

5 Post author: TimS 02 June 2013 02:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (433)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Larks 03 June 2013 11:51:46AM 2 points [-]

You thought his username gave you over 13 bits of evidence?

Comment author: syllogism 03 June 2013 12:51:06PM *  11 points [-]

I needed fewer than 13 bits of evidence: http://lesswrong.com/lw/fp5/2012_survey_results/

I likely committed some level of base-rate fallacy though (regardless of what the truth turns out to be). Trans* is more available to me because I hang out in queer communities, and know multiple transgender people.

Comment author: BlindIdiotPoster 08 August 2013 09:10:37AM 1 point [-]

The username contains more than 13 bits of information (being 14 characters long) so this might not be too unreasonable.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 08 August 2013 07:52:44AM 0 points [-]

Transsexualism seems way overrepresented in geeky circles: off the top of my head, I could think of seven MtF and two FtM transsexuals within my circle of acquaintances, and there might be a few that I'm forgetting. LW definitely matches the definition of a "geeky community", so assuming a relatively high base rate would have been reasonable to me, based on my experience.