Brian_Tomasik comments on A personal history of involvement with effective altruism - Less Wrong

10 Post author: JonahSinick 11 June 2013 04:49AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Brian_Tomasik 03 July 2014 04:53:15AM 1 point [-]

This is where his fellow scientists call him a "crackpot" because he can't replicate any of his experimental findings. ;)

More seriously, the sim could modify his observations to make him observe the right things. For instance, change the photons entering his eyes to be in line with what they should be, change the historical records a la 1984, etc. Or let him add an epicycle to his theory to account for the otherwise unexplainable results.

In practice, I doubt atomic-level effects are ever going to produce clearly observable changes outside of physics labs, so 99.99999% of the time the simulators wouldn't have to worry about this as long as they simulated macroscopic objects to enough detail.

Comment author: CCC 04 July 2014 08:29:49AM 0 points [-]

In practice, I doubt atomic-level effects are ever going to produce clearly observable changes outside of physics labs, so 99.99999% of the time the simulators wouldn't have to worry about this as long as they simulated macroscopic objects to enough detail.

Well, yes, I'm not saying that this would make it easy to discover evidence that we are living in a simulation. It would simply make it possible to do so.