Yosarian2 comments on Near-Term Risk: Killer Robots a Threat to Freedom and Democracy - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Epiphany 14 June 2013 06:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (105)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Yosarian2 17 June 2013 08:49:28PM 0 points [-]

When killer robots are outlawed, only rogue nations will have massive drone armies.

That's not necessarily a huge issue. If all the major powers agree to not have automated killing drones, and a few minor rogue states (say, Iran) ignore that and develop their own killer drones, then (at least in the near term) that probably won't give them a big enough advantage over semi-autonomous drones controlled by major nations to be a big deal; an Iranian automated drone army probably still isn't a match for the American military, the American military has too many other technological advantages.

On the other hand, if one or more major powers start building large numbers of fully autonomous drones, then everyone is going to. That defiantly sounds like a scenario we should try to avoid, especially since that kind of arms race is something that I could see eventually leading to unfriendly AI.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 18 June 2013 12:07:53AM 0 points [-]

One issue is how easy it is to secretly build an army of autonomous drones?

Comment author: Yosarian2 18 June 2013 01:21:02AM 0 points [-]

Developing the technology in secret is probably quite possible. Large-scale deployment, though, building a large army of them, would probably be quite hard to hide, especially from modern satellite photography and information technology.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 21 June 2013 03:43:04AM 1 point [-]

Why? Just build a large number of non-autonomous drones and then upgrade the software at the last minute.

Comment author: Yosarian2 21 June 2013 08:01:44PM 0 points [-]

I suppose. Would that really give you enough of an advantage to be worth the diplomatic cost, though? The difference between a semi-autonomous Predator drone and a fully-autonomous Predator drone in military terms doesn't seem all that significant.

Now, you could make a type of military unit that would really take advantage of being fully autonomous and have a real advantage, like a fully autonomous air-to-air fighter for example (not really practical to do with semi autonomous drones because of delayed reaction time), but it would seem like that would be much harder to hide.