OrphanWilde comments on Can we dodge the mindkiller? - Less Wrong

5 Post author: NancyLebovitz 14 June 2013 12:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (103)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 14 June 2013 03:23:07PM 1 point [-]

Is that a No-True-Scottsman argument or is there something subtle I'm missing there?

Comment author: RowanE 14 June 2013 04:21:43PM 0 points [-]

I don't think it's a no true scotsman thing, although as I was writing the comment I did worry that I was veering into that territory.

How one defines a Democrat varies, and only some ways of defining it make sense with the sort of Democrats you describe, and I don't think the overlap of "Democrats" and "people who identify with a specific political -ism" contains those. This will vary a bit depending on how one is interpreting "identify with a specific political -ism". I think this is where the disagreement lies.

Comment author: ChristianKl 21 June 2013 11:45:02AM *  0 points [-]

You confuse party affilation with political beliefs. It's a mistake that comes from living in a two party state and having a media that tries to convince everyone that red and blue are the two political beliefs that one can have.

It's very worthile to have a mental concept of political beliefs that goes beyond party affilation.

George Orwell would say that the media tainted the language in a way that makes it impossible to analyse political beliefs in your vocabulary.