army1987 comments on How should Eliezer and Nick's extra $20 be split - Less Wrong

9 Post author: Coscott 14 June 2013 06:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (66)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 June 2013 11:01:46AM 1 point [-]

if Nick had said 15% and Eliezer had said 0%

Then either the money was Nick's or Eliezer was lying. And if either of them was lying, no juggling with the numbers they said would make much sense.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 June 2013 03:35:15PM 1 point [-]

Then either the money was Nick's or Eliezer was lying.

Yes, I'm saying that the money is Nick's in that case.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 June 2013 05:28:41PM 1 point [-]

I misremembered which one 2 was (I thought it was the one that's actually 4), and I thought you were talking about something it did but you thought was wrong to do.

(WTH is happening to my reading comprehension skills lately?)