Larks comments on How should Eliezer and Nick's extra $20 be split - Less Wrong

9 Post author: Coscott 14 June 2013 06:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (66)

Sort By: Best

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Larks 15 June 2013 04:13:46PM 1 point [-]

EY believes that EY deserves it with probability p, while NB believes that EY deserves it with probability q.

You are using the same notation the OP used to mean something different!

Comment author: Plasmon 15 June 2013 05:00:50PM * 1 point [-]

Really?

EY believes that EY deserves it with probability p, while NB believes that EY deserves it with probability q

Oh! You're right. The OP's q is 1-(my q), so this solution reduces to option (1) in the OP.