Coscott comments on How should Eliezer and Nick's extra $20 be split - Less Wrong

9 Post author: Coscott 14 June 2013 06:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (66)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Coscott 17 June 2013 02:42:25AM 1 point [-]

Because you have two people, they might disagree on how independent their sources are, and further disagree on how independent their sources which told them their sources were independent are. This infinite regress must be stopped at some point, since they don't have infinite time to compare all of their notes, and when it stops, the original question must be answered.

For me though, I understand that we cant do Bayesian updates completely rigorously unless we account for all the information, but since we are not perfect Bayesianists, I think the question of how well we can do on a first approximation is an important one.