Mimosa comments on [LINK] The Selected Papers Network - Less Wrong

9 Post author: Qiaochu_Yuan 14 June 2013 08:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (8)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Mimosa 15 June 2013 10:11:34PM 1 point [-]

Is it possible to get enough people interested in this to do something with it (like a website?)

It seems like it would take a herculean effort to get enough scientists interested and willing to participate. But then again, there may be many more scientists disillusioned with the academic journal system than I think.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 15 June 2013 11:45:11PM 4 points [-]

I'd be happy to pioneer it on LW if it was a simple enough algorithm. StackOverflow, MathOverflow, Quora, possibly Reddit might be quite interested if it worked. (I don't know if there's acknowledged borrowing - keeping in mind that we borrowed all of Reddit's code in the first place and it was under an open-source give-back license - but Reddit seems to have adopted LW's highlight-recent-comments innovation, so there's been some backflow.) Wikipedia is disintegrating under the weight of deletionists and would probably have to be rebooted more than healed, but Earth needs a Wikipedia. There are plenty of likely adopters / testers / provers in advance of the general scientific community if a superior karma algorithm can be found.

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 15 June 2013 11:52:40PM *  2 points [-]

But then again, there may be many more scientists disillusioned with the academic journal system than I think.

At least in mathematics my impression is that there are a lot. The Cost of Knowledge boycott against Elsevier has about 13,000 signatures at the moment. Discussion of this kind of issue in the mathematical community has been happening for awhile now, most prominently at places like Tim Gowers' and Terence Tao's blogs, but also on Google Plus.