Trevor_Blake comments on Why do theists, undergrads, and Less Wrongers favor one-boxing on Newcomb? - Less Wrong

15 Post author: CarlShulman 19 June 2013 01:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (299)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 June 2013 09:20:41AM 2 points [-]

If the Predictor is accurate or omniscient, then the game is rigged and it becomes a different problem. If the Predictor is making guesses then box predicting and box selecting are both interesting to figure out.

WTF? Who creates a system in which they can offer either some help now, or significantly more later, unless they are malicious or running an experiment?

Or you live in a system nobody in particular created (capitalism) and work at a social service with limited resources with a clientele who have no background experience with adults who can be trusted. An employer telling hem "work now and I'll pay you later" is not convincing, while a peanut butter sandwich right now is.

Comment author: Decius 19 June 2013 05:31:54PM 2 points [-]

How about "Here's a sandwich, if you work for me there I will give you another one at lunchtime and money at the end of the day."

It's the case where the immediate reward has to be so much smaller than the delayed reward but still be mutually exclusive that confuses me, not the discounting due to lack of trust.