PhilosophyStudent comments on Why do theists, undergrads, and Less Wrongers favor one-boxing on Newcomb? - Less Wrong

15 Post author: CarlShulman 19 June 2013 01:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (299)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: PhilosophyStudent 21 June 2013 12:25:45AM 0 points [-]

Yes. So it is consistent for a CDTer to believe that:

(1) When picking a decision theory, you should pick one that tells you to one-box in instances of NP where the prediction has not yet occurred; and

(2) CDT correctly describes two-boxing as the rational decision in NP.

I committed the sin of brevity in order to save time (LW is kind of a guilty pleasure rather than something I actually have the time to be doing).

Comment author: CarlShulman 21 June 2013 12:44:18AM 0 points [-]

OK, that's all good, but already part of the standard picture and leaves almost all the arguments intact over cases one didn't get to precommit for, which is the standard presentation in any case. So I'd say it doesn't much support the earlier claim:

For those that haven't, I suspect that the "disagreement" with philosophers is mostly apparent and not actual

Also:

brevity

No pressure.

Comment author: PhilosophyStudent 29 June 2013 12:45:42AM *  0 points [-]

Perhaps my earlier claim was too strong.

Nevertheless, I do think that people on LW who haven't thought about the issues a lot might well not have a solid enough opinion to be either agreeing or disagreeing with the LW one-boxing view or the two-boxing philosopher's view. I suspect some of these people just note that one-boxing is the best algorithm and think that this means that they're agreeing with LW when in fact this leaves them neutral on the issue until they make their claim more precise.

I also think one of the reasons for the lack of two-boxers on LW is that LW often presents two-boxing arguments in a slogan form which fails to do justice to these arguments (see my comments here and here). Which isn't to say that the two-boxers are right but is to say I think the debate gets skewed unreasonably in one-boxers' favour on LW (not always, but often enough to influence people's opinions).