DanielLC comments on Universal Law - Less Wrong

39 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 29 April 2007 06:41AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: conchis 29 April 2007 01:05:29PM 1 point [-]

I wonder whether claims about the inviolability of physical laws (in general, rather than any specific law) actually mean anything... at a fundamental level the distinction between a law with an exception and just having a different law is pretty difficult to pin down. Either the "exception" is due to differences in circumstances that were previously ignored, or it's just random. In either case, you can probably always make a new "law" that accommodates the difference.

Comment author: DanielLC 29 December 2009 12:12:37AM 12 points [-]

It does mean something. It's a definition of "physical law".

The idea that physical laws are simple is what has huge implications.