gjm comments on Some reservations about Singer's child-in-the-pond argument - Less Wrong

21 Post author: JonahSinick 19 June 2013 11:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (120)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gjm 23 June 2013 02:15:04PM 0 points [-]

Not necessarily more important. (If it turns out that actually there isn't any realistic way to convince them to address the problem, then "ok, so what else can we do?" is a higher-value question.)

Well worth addressing, though, for sure. Getting governments and very rich people to spend more on helping the neediest parts of the world might be a very valuable activity.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 June 2013 10:48:12AM *  0 points [-]

How would you know there isn't any realistic way to impact them using your resources? Donation to a think-tank seems one possible option.

Comment author: gjm 24 June 2013 05:51:41PM 0 points [-]

Probably hard to know with much confidence. So I suppose the question might be (in so far as this makes sense) objectively unimportant but subjectively important,