I suspect anyone here is less different from Tim Ferriss than they'd like to be able to justifiably claim (see here, here, here, here).

Thankyou.

I mean Tim the method.

Again, thankyou. Tim is far more instrumentally rational than either myself or the vast majority of people here. His epistemic rationality is less impressive but would probably still top quartile among lesswrong participants if he was one.

What makes you different from Tim Ferriss?

In my case the most significant difference would be Executive Function. His is excellent (albeit idiosyncratic), mine is abysmal.