CarlShulman comments on Bayes versus Science Round Two: Battle of the Banks - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (34)
For mines, that's very unsurprising: as long as the mineral resources sell for more than production costs it's worth producing. Saudi Arabia produces oil at much lower cost than the marginal well, but it still makes sense to dig new wells. By the same token, small subsistence farmers who have land but can't sell it just earn less than less productive farmers elsewhere.
But you're probably thinking of this post by Robin Hanson, and the 5:1 result is for developing countries undergoing fast catch-up growth (vs 2:1 for developed countries). And it's the worst decile of competitors vs the best, not the worst vs the average.
One thing to remember about this is that sometimes lower labor productivity is rational in light of legacy capital investments. E.g. new power plants and factories might require fewer workers, but if you already have the old factory built, you can avoid spending a huge amount of labor building a new factory for a while.
I'm not sure that is what I'm thinking of; I seem to recall something more pessimistic than that, challenging the assertion that the less efficient factories really went out of business. "More likely to survive" != "Much more likely to survive", it may just be a statistically significant 'difference' (was it)?
What I got from Hanson's post was that people overestimated the speed of selection acting on profitability. Even though one person might be able to produce widgets half as cheaply as the next person, it might take a much longer time than people think for the first person to displace the second person, especially if the first person's lower costs per unit are due to their particular size (such that expanding would increase their costs).
Basically, you need to be actually losing money to go out of business, and even if you're making more money than the next guy, that may not translate to you making him lose money.