Larks comments on Bad Concepts Repository - Less Wrong

20 Post author: moridinamael 27 June 2013 03:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (204)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Larks 27 June 2013 10:46:36AM 3 points [-]

We like to think about whether we "deserve" what we get, or whether someone else deserves what he/she has. But in reality there is no such mechanism.

So you're saying we like thinking about a moral property, but we're wrong to do so, because this property is not reliably instanciated? Desert theorist do not need to disagree - there's no law of physics that means people necessarily get what they deserve. Rather, we are supposed to be the mechanism - we must regulate our own affairs so as to ensure that people get what they deserve.

Comment author: Leonhart 27 June 2013 03:01:30PM 1 point [-]

Perhaps the bad concept here is actually "karma", which I understand roughly to be the claim that there is a law of physics that means people necessarily get what they deserve.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 27 June 2013 10:52:10PM 1 point [-]

I think around here we can call that the just-world fallacy.