maia comments on Public Service Announcement Collection - Less Wrong

37 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 27 June 2013 05:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (328)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: maia 28 June 2013 02:34:19AM 1 point [-]

Indeed! Even assuming I'm somewhat better than typical, condoms make me a bit nervous.

Considering that most people are sexually active for far more than one year, that 2% rate is completely meaningless.

(Frivolous nitpicking) Yeah, but I think it's probably one of the better units of measure they could have chosen. "Per intercourse event" would probably be so low that people wouldn't grok the fact that their overall chances were much worse. But any unit more than a year doesn't make much sense.

Comment author: [deleted] 28 June 2013 11:52:30AM 3 points [-]

I think a decent measure would be P(getting pregnant|one intercourse with condom)/P(getting pregnant|one intercourse without condom).

Comment author: somervta 01 July 2013 08:00:02AM 1 point [-]

Do you really think the average person being/needing information about condoms can understand that?

Comment author: [deleted] 01 July 2013 10:25:54AM 3 points [-]

If worded as “Using a condom reduces the chances of getting pregnant by X%” or “by N times”, probably.