I notice that few portfolios will very sharply reflect anyone's belief about one particular thing. Did you buy gold as a hedge against inflation, against the zombie apocalypse, because you thought a lot of idiots were going to be bidding up its price in the future, or because you like the pretty shiniez? You can infer something about inflation beliefs from a portfolio, but there are any number of other considerations as well; the problem is underdetermined. Additionally, of course, not every belief can be liquidly bet on at all; in 2010 it was hard to go either short or long on the Higgs discovery outside of finding an individual to bet with. At an absolute minimum, bets can surely reveal beliefs about illiquid and shallow markets.
in 2010 it was hard to go either short or long on the Higgs discovery outside of finding an individual to bet with.
Intrade had a Higgs market. It wasn't hugely liquid, but it was probably better than finding individuals.
In a post today at EconLog, Bryan defends the "a bet is a tax on bullshit" maxim contra "portfolios reveal beliefs, bets reveal personality traits and public posturing" (preferred by Noah Smith and Tyler Cowen).
The full post can be found here.