CAE_Jones comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 20, chapter 90 - Less Wrong

9 Post author: palladias 02 July 2013 02:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (609)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: CAE_Jones 02 July 2013 04:12:54AM 6 points [-]

Curious; when I read Professor Quirrel going into "protect the information from Harry Potter" mode for Macgonnagle, I almost immediately thought this was deeper than "I've changed my mind and it is no longer a good day and holyshit he's going to kill us". The overwhelming majority of readers assume he is being sincerely cautious in an effort to save the universe. I was assuming that there was obviously a slightly deeper plot involved, though I hadn't gotten far in thinking about what before I read the suggestions about alternative sources such as the Chamber of Secrets.

(Harry's lecture to Macgonnagle on identity-based strategy actually made me realize something about myself I feel is worth analysis... somewhere. I may or may not get back on that if I figure out if it's worth publishing.)

Comment author: MarkusRamikin 02 July 2013 09:18:55AM *  19 points [-]

To me it seemed obvious that Quirrel was just taking the opportunity to isolate Harry from Dumbledore-and-co. He's always tried to make Harry distrust Dumbledore. Now Harry will find them even more obstructionist to his goals, so he will only have Quirrel to go to with his ideas and plans.

I wouldn't be surprised if the next thing we see is Quirrel supplying Restricted books to Harry.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 02 July 2013 10:33:49PM 2 points [-]

This is definitely true, because he was encouraging Harry in private before setting McGonagall to oppose him.

Comment author: linkhyrule5 02 July 2013 11:14:30PM 0 points [-]

I think it's more likely that while Quirrell wants Harry to be dependent on him for information, he also doesn't plan on telling him very much. He's keeping Harry away from people who are (relatively) easy to manipulate (see: McGonagall just took Harry at his word and undid his Time Turner lock), and making sure that he's the one with a final say as to what Harry does and does not know.

Insofar as he can, anyway. We'll see how well that works. Quirrell's deflection w.r.t. spell creation was sufficiently obvious that Harry's probably noticed, which in turn means that he'll be making his own plans.

Comment author: Velorien 02 July 2013 12:03:59PM 11 points [-]

Given the chapter title, the first thought that leapt into my mind is "he's being exactly what Harry wants/expects to see, then being exactly what Minerva wants/expects to see, leaving no-one including us aware of what he actually wants or is actually going to do". Malus points to Minerva for the fact that he told her straight out what he was doing to Harry, but it didn't occur to her whether he might be doing the same to her.

Comment author: Decius 02 July 2013 08:54:50PM 1 point [-]

She didn't give any indication that the possibility occured to her, so she's either one level down or a full level above Quirrel.

My prediction is that Znptbaantyr vf n yriry qbja, ohg gung Qhzoyrqber vf n yriry nobir jurer Dhveery rkcrpgf uvz gb or.

Comment author: Fermatastheorem 02 July 2013 09:50:07PM 0 points [-]

Does Dumbledore observe Quirrell's interaction with either Harry or McGonagall?

Comment author: Decius 02 July 2013 10:14:42PM 0 points [-]

Not that I know of. That isn't a requirement for Dumbledore to be GenreSavvy enough to effectively manipulate Quirrell and/or Harry.

Has Dumbledore ever done anything for Quirrell or Harry that he didn't want to?

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 02 July 2013 05:03:14AM 11 points [-]

What's wrong with assuming that Quirrell wants to keep the universe intact? Quote:

I have no great fondness for the universe, but I do live there.

Comment author: Vaniver 02 July 2013 04:07:28PM 4 points [-]

Harry's lecture to Macgonnagle on identity-based strategy actually made me realize something about myself I feel is worth analysis... somewhere. I may or may not get back on that if I figure out if it's worth publishing.

I get the impression that this is a known part of the LW-sphere, but since no articles immediately come to mind that suggests there's space for one. I recommend committing to write something, and then deciding whether to put it into main or discussion based on how good you think it is at some specified point in the future.

Comment author: DanielLC 02 July 2013 05:51:30AM 3 points [-]

I thought it might have been that he doesn't want Harry to destroy himself doing something stupid before he could take over the universe.

Comment author: mare-of-night 02 July 2013 10:00:51PM 1 point [-]

In light of all the talk about heroic responsibility, my first thought was that if he really, really wanted Harry kept away from those books, he'd steal them or something. (This specific method isn't a very good one because it would raise suspicion, but there has to be a better way to keep them from Harry than going through Macgonnagle.) And maybe he was hoping that Harry would notice the increased wards and try to go there because of it, but that seems like he might be assuming too much.

Comment author: gwern 03 July 2013 12:10:01AM 0 points [-]

he'd steal them or something

Such was warding the books rather than the entire Restricted Section. However, Quirrel seems to want to keep Harry away from quite a bit of knowledge: not just particular books, but the entire Restricted Section; not just random spell creation bits, but the entire field of spell creation. This suggests to me that there no single book that is problematic, but any book dealing with the topic at all beyond the fake "usual evasions". If that's the case, then he can't do much else - what is he going to do, abscond with an entire wing of the library?

Comment author: [deleted] 03 July 2013 02:35:01AM 8 points [-]

Note that warding books A, B, and C leaks more bits of information than warding all restricted books.

Comment author: gwern 03 July 2013 02:42:53AM 1 point [-]

That's a good point too.

Comment author: Benito 02 July 2013 12:17:39PM 1 point [-]

It seemed to me that Quirrel just wants to prevent Harry from bringing Hermione back so she doesn't affect his judgements (positively, but negatively for Quirrel).

Comment author: Decius 02 July 2013 08:52:06PM 1 point [-]

Quirrel want's Harry to solve the general-case bring-someone-back problem, because Voldemort wants that problem solved.

Comment author: Fermatastheorem 02 July 2013 09:44:05PM 1 point [-]

I agree, but he also doesn't want the universe destroyed in the process.