wedrifid comments on Against easy superintelligence: the unforeseen friction argument - Less Wrong

25 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 10 July 2013 01:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (48)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 July 2013 08:36:11AM 1 point [-]

A one-time pad has to be transmitted, too. MITM will crack it.

A one-time pad that needs to be transmitted can be violated by MITM. But if the relevant private mutual information is already shared or is shared directly without encryption then the encryption they use to communicate is not (in theory required to be) crackable. Since the claim was that "all encryption can be cracked in theory" it is not enough for some cases to be crackable, all must be.