ESRogs comments on Progress on automated mathematical theorem proving? - Less Wrong

14 Post author: JonahSinick 03 July 2013 06:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (65)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ESRogs 03 July 2013 11:50:47PM *  1 point [-]

As for intermediate milestones, I think all the progress that has been made in AI (and neuroscience!) for the last half-century should count. We now know a whole lot more about AI and brains than we used to.

EDIT: To be more specific, I think such feats as beating humans at chess and Jeopardy! or being able to passably translate texts and drive cars are significant.

Future milestones might include: * beating the Go world champion * significantly better machine translations * much more efficient theorem provers * strong general game players

I could see all of those happening without being able to replicate all human-generated mathematical proofs. But it would still seem like significant progress has been made.

Comment author: JonahSinick 03 July 2013 11:58:20PM 3 points [-]

I agree that there exist intermediate milestone. The question is how far the ones that have been surpassed are from the end goal. The relevant thing isn't how much we understand relative to what we used to know, but how much we understand relative to what's necessary to build a general artificial intelligence. The latter can be small even if the former is large.

Comment author: ESRogs 04 July 2013 12:16:00AM 2 points [-]

That's fair.