Baughn comments on Estimating the kolmogorov complexity of the known laws of physics? - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Strilanc 08 July 2013 04:30AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Baughn 09 July 2013 01:02:10AM *  2 points [-]

Well, I'm saying the possibility is worth considering. I'm hardly going to claim certainty in this area.

As for QM...

The metric I think makes sense is, roughly, observer-moments divided by CPU time. Simulating QM takes exponential time, yes, but there's an equivalent exponential increase in the number of observer-moments. So QM shouldn't have a penalty vs. classical.

On the flip side this type of prior would heavily favor low-fidelity simulations, but I don't know if that's any kind of strike against it.