So the ratio of success to failure in the set is almost meaningless,
Meaningless seems too strong – you seem to be assuming a very strong selection effect – what selection effect are you assuming?
In any case, we're not simply counting successes and failures.
systematic differences between the failures and successes could be interesting.
We're looking at this.
I'm currently working on a research project for MIRI, and I would welcome feedback on my research as I proceed. In this post, I describe the project.
As a part of an effort to steel-man objections to MIRI's mission, MIRI Executive Director Luke Muehlhauser has asked me to develop the following objection:
In Luke's initial email to me, he wrote:
Luke and I brainstormed a list of potential historical examples of people predicting the future 10+ years out, and using the predictions to inform their actions. We came up with the following potential examples, which I've listed in chronological order by approximate year: