This has already been downvoted into invisibility, but still I'll say here that I've found this list, which gives 55 systems within 5 parsecs around us. With a bit of work, current estimates of the probability of habitable or inhabited planets could be compiled from this.
More importantly, I learned that the ESPRESSO project is going to collect far better data than we currently have, starting in 2017. If I don't misunderstand the specs too badly, ESPRESSO should be able to tell us fairly definitely where in these (and more) systems there are planets with sizes and orbits that make them habitable. And from 2022, the E-ELT will help us learn more about their chemical compositions and probable weather patterns. From what I understand about theories of planetary habitability, these data should be enough to see where, if at all, to suspect neighbors.
I'm very happy this research is being done.
Will still take 2-3 orbital periods of the prospective worlds to be sure of them... but yeah, I'm thrilled at the astronomy research happening lately.
I expect everyone here has an opinion on the Drake Equation. (Comment if I'm wrong.) And that's because it is an easy story to remember and spread. Never mind its glaring inadequacy or the symbols it uses: it gives you a number of alien civilizations and somehow that sticks. I'd like to see if a science meme with similar properties could be created to carry a transhumanist payload. So. Could you convince a random person of the following three points if you wanted to?
I think you could. And if you do, and if you can give a number of light-years, regardless of how much you emphasize the low confidence, aliens will suddenly seem more real to that random person. And so will, if not full transhumanism, at least some vague notion that intelligence must grow much like life does. I think that could reach a lot of people.
(If anybody complains that the expectation of some Singularity-like development is ideological: no, it is a reasonable guess based on the current evidence, much like Drake's expectation of every technological civilization's eventual self-destruction was reasonable in his Cold War era.)
The brain I'm typing this from knows too little math or astronomy to do this locally, so I'm throwing out the idea. Anyone care to play with this?