Desrtopa comments on Crossing the experiments: a baby - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 05 August 2013 12:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (90)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Desrtopa 05 August 2013 06:41:23PM 11 points [-]

The post is currently at -5. I bet if he had basically the same content but it was about some robot he just created the post would have a positive rank.

Creating a robot and creating a baby may be very broadly similar in output, but could hardly be less similar in input. Creating a robot requires extensive domain knowledge, whereas you can make a baby without even knowing how babies are made, although ideally you really shouldn't.

Comment author: mwengler 06 August 2013 02:37:04PM 1 point [-]

The success of our species is gigantically driven by specialization. I do not need to know how a toilet and a sewage system work in order to use them. I do not have to know the details of creating food, storing it and transporting it without it going bad, in order to eat it, or even cook it. I do not need to know the circuit details of a cell=phone chip in order to create applications for smart phones.

It would be an amazingly high opportunity cost with little if any benefit if all people who had children were to know how babies are made in great detail. What are you thinking that you state as a moral truth that they should?

Comment author: Desrtopa 07 August 2013 03:02:49AM 2 points [-]

If you do not know what actions to engage in to make a baby, then you're almost certainly not going to make one with an appropriate level of consideration, preparation and forethought.