Desrtopa comments on Two More Things to Unlearn from School - Less Wrong

54 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 12 July 2007 05:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (148)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bigjeff5 27 January 2011 10:52:27PM 2 points [-]

I have read the opinion that the invention of public schooling in its current form was designed to create a more agreeable populace and workforce. People who will do what they are told, basically.

The exceptional would rise to the top naturally, and overcome the barriers set in place, but it would ensure the less than gifted stayed mediocre.

I haven't read any studies to this affect, but it seems plausible, if rather conspiracy theory-ish. I don't think it was quite so intentional, but it seems to be the result, and it has a great deal of momentum for those who run things to allow it to continue if they ever recognize the truth of it.

Could you imagine the nightmare it would be to be a politician in a country where everybody is skeptical of authority as a matter of course? It's a politician's worst nightmare to have someone question his reasoning if it is based on something flimsy or non-existent, what if that happened by default for everyone in the country?

Comment author: Desrtopa 27 January 2011 11:02:48PM 2 points [-]

Then those most able to deal with the skeptics would rise to the top. It wouldn't get rid of politicians, but it would change the sort of politicians who have a relative competitive advantage.

Comment author: bigjeff5 28 January 2011 01:39:31AM 0 points [-]

Certainly, and a significant portion of the current crop of politicians would not be among the new group of politicians.

Do you see the problem?

Comment author: Desrtopa 28 January 2011 01:55:44AM 0 points [-]

Of course. But at least there are prospective politicians who could benefit from it. It's not as if they would uniformly stand to lose.

Comment author: pnrjulius 09 April 2012 06:03:52AM 0 points [-]

Yes, but that means changing the status quo, which means redistributing power, and if there's one thing people in power do not like, it is redistributing power.

We might ultimately have to make this happen by force. (I hope not... but I can't rule it out.)