Comment Permalink

Rain11y670

I continue to donate $1000 per month despite a 20% pay cut.

Rain11y140

To those discussing monthly vs. lump sum: Luke recognized the issue a few days ago and counted 6 months' worth of my donations toward this matching drive, much as the original commitment was counted at 12 months (now all paid).

-11Gurkenglas11y

5lukeprog11y

Thanks very much!

See in context

38 MIRI's 2013 Summer Matching Challenge

by lukeprog

23rd Jul 2013

2 min read

122

38

(MIRI maintains Less Wrong, with generous help from Trike Apps, and much of the core content is written by salaried MIRI staff members.)

Update 09-15-2013: The fundraising drive has been completed! My thanks to everyone who contributed.

The original post follows below...

Thanks to the generosity of several major donors,^† every donation to the Machine Intelligence Research Institute made from now until (the end of) August 15th, 2013 will be matched dollar-for-dollar, up to a total of $200,000!

Donate Now!

Now is your chance to double your impact while helping us raise up to $400,000 (with matching) to fund our research program.

This post is also a good place to ask your questions about our activities and plans — just post a comment!

If you have questions about what your dollars will do at MIRI, you can also schedule a quick call with MIRI Deputy Director Louie Helm: louie@intelligence.org (email), 510-717-1477 (phone), louiehelm (Skype).

Early this year we made a transition from movement-building to research, and we've hit the ground running with six major new research papers, six new strategic analyses on our blog, and much more. Give now to support our ongoing work on the future's most important problem.

Accomplishments in 2013 so far

Released six new research papers: (1) Definability of Truth in Probabilistic Logic, (2) Intelligence Explosion Microeconomics, (3) Tiling Agents for Self-Modifying AI, (4) Robust Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma, (5) A Comparison of Decision Algorithms on Newcomblike Problems, and (6) Responses to Catastrophic AGI Risk: A Survey.
Held our 2nd and 3rd research workshops.
Published six new analyses to our blog: The Lean Nonprofit, AGI Impact Experts and Friendly AI Experts, Five Theses..., When Will AI Be Created?, Friendly AI Research as Effective Altruism, and What is Intelligence?
Published the Facing the Intelligence Explosion ebook.
Published several other substantial articles: Recommended Courses for MIRI Researchers, Decision Theory FAQ, A brief history of ethically concerned scientists, Bayesian Adjustment Does Not Defeat Existential Risk Charity, and others.
Published our first three expert interviews, with James Miller, Roman Yampolskiy, and Nick Beckstead.
Launched our new website at intelligence.org as part of changing our name to MIRI.
Relocated to new offices... 2 blocks from UC Berkeley, which is ranked 5th in the world in mathematics, and 1st in the world in mathematical logic.
And of course much more.

Future Plans You Can Help Support

We will host many more research workshops, including one in September in Berkeley, one in December (with John Baez attending) in Berkeley, and one in Oxford, UK (dates TBD).
Eliezer will continue to publish about open problems in Friendly AI. (Here is #1 and #2.)
We will continue to publish strategic analyses and expert interviews, mostly via our blog.
We will publish nicely-edited ebooks (Kindle, iBooks, and PDF) for more of our materials, to make them more accessible: The Sequences, 2006-2009 and The Hanson-Yudkowsky AI Foom Debate.
We will continue to set up the infrastructure (e.g. new offices, researcher endowments) required to host a productive Friendly AI research team, and (over several years) recruit enough top-level math talent to launch it.
We hope to hire an experienced development director (job ad not yet posted), so that the contributions of our current supporters can be multiplied even further by a professional fundraiser.

(Other projects are still being surveyed for likely cost and strategic impact.)

We appreciate your support for our high-impact work! Donate now, and seize a better than usual chance to move our work forward.

If you have questions about donating, please contact Louie Helm at (510) 717-1477 or louie@intelligence.org.

^† $200,000 of total matching funds has been provided by Jaan Tallinn, Loren Merritt, Rick Schwall, and Alexei Andreev.

Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)

Personal Blog

38

MIRI's 2013 Summer Matching Challenge

New Comment

122 comments, sorted by

top scoring

Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 6:45 AM

Some comments are truncated due to high volume. (⌘F to expand all)Change truncation settings

[-]Rain11y670

I continue to donate $1000 per month despite a 20% pay cut.

[-]Rain11y140

[-]lukeprog11y120

Right.

If you prefer to donate monthly, but also want to take advantage of matching, then just tell us you're pledging to keep up the monthly donation for at least 6 months, and we'll count 6 months' worth of your matching donation to the drive, to take advantage of matching.

9Leonhart11y

Luke, I've been donating monthly for, um, I think a couple of years now? I so pledge, in addition to anything else I donate. PM me if you need ID to verify this.

2lukeprog11y

PMed.

5lukeprog11y

Thanks very much!

-11Gurkenglas11y

[-]iceman11y560

Wrote a cheque for $5,000.

(I put the redacted image of my donation online because someone else decided to start an ad-hoc fundraising effort for MIRI on FIMFiction.)

9lukeprog11y

Thanks very much! I would also like to affirm that thread's claim that "if what you really want is ponies, the Truly Friendly AI will in fact give you ponies." ("Really want", of course, requires lots of unpacking.)

6Eliezer Yudkowsky11y

Not quite affirmable; a CEV-based FAI only gives you ponies if that's what you would-want, if on average everyone would-want is to give a pony to someone who would-want one. (Because an individually based mechanism might e.g. look at babies and determine that what they would-want as individuals is eternal feeding and burping.)

0Gurkenglas11y

Can you find a more obviously bad example of the implications of individually-based CEV? I find that if a baby would-want to feed and burp, that's what it should get; and if two parents want to spawn another human with CEV rights, they might not want to spawn it initially only would-wanting to feed and burp.

1iceman11y

Yes, though I find it improbable that they'd Really Want ponies. (Devil's advocate: there are people who participate in the fandom daily, and have big chunks of their identity tied up in being a brony. If there were actually a population where people would Really Want ponies, this would be the one.)

[-]Furcas11y500

Donated 500 USD (~530 CAD).

9lukeprog11y

Thanks very much!

[-]scotherns11y480

Donated $50 (on top of my automated monthly donation).

4lukeprog11y

Thanks!

[-]David Althaus11y470

Donated $500.

4lukeprog11y

Thanks very much!

[-]Eneasz11y450

$200, and finally signed up for monthly donations as well.

4lukeprog11y

Awesome, thanks!

[-]BT_Uytya11y430

$10.00

I'm a student and this is my second PayPal transaction ever, so I was a bit scared to donate more.

Hopefully my example will inspire anybody else. $10.00 isn't very much, but come on, it's not like it is worse than not donating anything at all.

[-]somervta11y140

It did. Also a student, just made my first donation. Whaddya know, public announcement of donations really does motivate!

[-]OnTheOtherHandle11y120

This does make me feel better - thanks. I'm just entering college and don't even have a bank account yet, but your post inspired me to get one fast so I can donate whatever I can afford within the matching window :)

[-]A1987dM11y100

$10.00 isn't very much, but come on, it's not like it is worse than not donating anything at all.

http://xkcd.com/871/

:-)

4lukeprog11y

Thanks!

0Adele_L11y

Could be, if the transaction/processing/etc... is more. I think $10 is enough to be a net positive, but I'm not sure where the threshold is.

[-]Malo11y160

Transaction fees for non-profits such as MIRI on PayPal are 2.2% + $0.30, and the processing is automated with our donor database solution so it's definitely net positive :)

[-]ArisKatsaris11y410

$1,200 donated.

I'd like to remark on something that annoys me: Your "donation meter" (at least the one on your site, if not the one in the post above) ought either be certain to be updated daily, or at the very least it should note when it was last updated. I find the phrase "raised to date" frustrating and annoying when I can't trust that the "to date" is actually current.

[-]lukeprog11y120

Donation meters updated, courtesy of Malo Bourgon.

[-]lukeprog11y100

Thanks very much!

I'll ask our web guys if we can add a 'last updated' thing somewhere.

2Kawoomba11y

Well, one way to be sure would be to donate the remainder.

[-][anonymous]11y390

yadda yadda, continuing to donate 1/3 of my income, yadda yadda

feed me karma

2lukeprog11y

[-]wmorgan11y370

$3,000.00

2lukeprog11y

Thanks very much!

[-]Rain11y310

I'd like to say that PMs from private_messaging disparaging this drive and my donations will NOT deter me from funding the mission I feel will help lead to the best possible future.

[-]Benquo11y300

$1,000 and my employer will match it.

3lukeprog11y

Thanks very much!

[-]player_0311y300

I donated $1000 and then went and bought Facing the Intelligence Explosion for the bare minimum price. (Just wanted to put that out there.)

I've also left myself a reminder to consider another donation a few days before this runs out. It'll depend on my financial situation, but I should be able to manage it.

[-]player_0311y210

I've donated a second $1000.

4lukeprog11y

Thanks again!!

2lukeprog11y

Thanks very much!

[-]So8res11y300

I donated. My employers match charitable donations, though not always in a timely fashion. I'm hoping that their contribution can be further matched.

[-]lukeprog11y100

Thanks! Who is your employer? We may need to send them some forms. We already have donation matching set up with Google, Microsoft, Boeing, Adobe, Fannie Mae, and several other companies through Network for Good and America's Charities.

You can also contact me privately via email.

7So8res11y

Google.

[-]So8res11y290

Wow, MIRI is more underfunded than I thought. I donated again, after freeing up some cash.

3lukeprog11y

Awesome, thanks!

[-]Ozymandias_King11y280

Donated 1400$

5lukeprog11y

Thanks very much!

[-]Larks11y280

Currently between jobs; donated $100 anyway, as the world is not a story and will not wait for my montage to finish.

4lukeprog11y

Thanks!

[-]JGWeissman11y270

I donated $5000.

3lukeprog11y

Thanks very much!

[-]kgalias11y240

Donated $50.

3lukeprog11y

Thanks!

[-]Kawoomba11y230

$50.

2lukeprog11y

Thanks!

[-]KnaveOfAllTrades11y200

Donated $50.

3lukeprog11y

Thanks!

[-]khafra11y200

Donated 0.9766578425 bitcoins, a number I chose since that's Chaitin's Omega for the shortest FAI.

8Eliezer Yudkowsky11y

(Consults Inverse Chaitin function in Wolfram Alpha.) Actually, is there a definition of Chaitin's Omega for particular programs? I thought it was just for universal Turing machines, or program classes with a measure on them anyway.

4khafra11y

Whoops, that's right. I, ah, may have just unleashed a trolly AI.

1endoself11y

Yes, you can take the probability that they will halt given a random input. This is analogous to the case of a universal Turing machine, since the way we ask it to simulate a random Turing machine is by giving it a random input string.

1khafra11y

Dangit, I should've said "the FAI is Turing-complete, you can carry out arbitrary computations simply by running it in carefully selected universes." With a five orders of magnitude improvement in timing, I could be witty.

4nshepperd11y

Is that the probability that the shortest FAI halts given random input?

2lukeprog11y

Thanks!

[-]LucasSloan11y200

Donated $50.

2lukeprog11y

Thanks!

[-]Halfwitz11y200

Just curious, whatever happened to EY's rationality books? You invested months of effort into them. Did you pull a sunk cost reversal? Or is publishing them not on the schedule till next year.

[-]Eliezer Yudkowsky11y150

The drafts came out unexciting according to reader reports. I suspect that magical writing energy ['magic' = not understood] was diverted from the rationality book into the first 63 chapters of HPMOR which I was doing in my 'off time' while writing the book, and which does have Yudkowskian magic according to readers. HPMOR and CFAR between them used up a lot of the marginal utility I thought we would get from the book which diminishes the marginal utility of completing it.

[-]Shmi11y100

Shoulda hired Yvain to retell them :)

[-]Eliezer Yudkowsky11y360

We tried that experiment, but Yvain was heading off to a new job and his first stab didn't seem to be a quick fix.

0[anonymous]11y

That makes a lot of sense actually. I can't think of anyone who could do a better job.

5Halfwitz11y

You should consider posting the drafts somewhere. At the very least, we'll get new material to add to the wiki. Wikis don't need 'magic.'

4Kawoomba11y

It's better not to publish than to publish something unpolished. "This is just a draft" wouldn't sufficiently counteract the impression of "I read something of perceived-lower quality, and it's from EY." Publish unpolished and perish, if you will.

[-]Eliezer Yudkowsky11y120

I wasn't especially happy with the reception / effects of publishing the unpolished TDT draft.

7lukeprog11y

They aren't a priority for this year. We briefly contracted with two different writers who might have been able to finish the books without pulling Eliezer away from his other priorities, but that didn't work. We're still thinking about what is best to do with the drafts.

[-]Simon Fischer11y190

66$, with some help of a friend.

2lukeprog11y

Thanks!

[-]Rukifellth11y110

I've only just now gotten a job, and may owe my dad too much money to make this donation drive, but I'll see what I can do. If things go as planned, I might be able to give 700 by the deadline.

Also, isn't three weeks something of a short window?

4lukeprog11y

We announced it to our blog on July 8th, and to our newsletter a bit after that. This is just the first time we mentioned it on LW.

[-]Rukifellth11y210

Paycheck came in, donated the 700!

0lukeprog11y

Thanks!

0Kawoomba11y

You mean "Thanks very much!", to stay consistent. You're welcome!

[-]ArisKatsaris11y140

I'm still surprised that it took you two weeks before mentioning it in LessWrong. Was this delay by neglect or design?

[-]lukeprog11y210

In part, we wanted to learn something about the degree to which donors are following the blog, following our newsletter, or following Less Wrong. I also wanted to be able to link from this post to a forthcoming interview with Benja Fallenstein that explains in more detail what we actually do at the workshops and why, but that was taking too long to complete, so I decided to just hurry up and post.

[-]somervta11y100

Data point: I was following the blog, which is where I first heard about the drive, but it was the comments on this thread which got me to finally donate.

6Benya11y

For people stumbling upon this in the future: That interview has now been published. (Sorry to have been the cause of that delay :-/)

0Rukifellth11y

I see, my apologies.

[-]JonahS11y100

The links to Eliezer's Open Problems in FAI papers are broken.

9Louie11y

Fixed. Thanks.

[-]amcknight11y60

For the goal of eventually creating FAI, it seems work can be roughly divided into making the first AGI (1) have humane values and (2) keep those values. Current attention seems to be focused on the 2nd category of problems. The work I've seen in the first category: CEV (9 years old!), Paul Christiano's man-in-a-box indirect normativity, Luke's decision neuroscience, Daniel Dewey's value learning... I really like these approaches but they are only very early starting points compared to what will eventually be required.

Do you have any plans to tackle the hu... (read more)

[-]lukeprog11y140

Do you have any plans to tackle the humane values problem?

Yes. The next open problem description in Eliezer's writing queue is in this category.

[-]Rukifellth11y50

I think small donors should also state their donations amounts of 50-100 dollars. Having counted the medium and large donations in this thread to a rough total of 11,000 dollars, it seems unlikely that the goal is being reached with just those, and I have a feeling there will be some sort of "breaking the ice" effect if small donors chirped up about their chip ins, so to speak. Right now the number of medium and large donors represented in this thread eclipses the smalls.

[-]ShardPhoenix11y40

I was going to donate (a not-huge amount) but I can't because Paypal won't accept my credit card. Don't know why. I did have a Paypal account that got blocked years ago for some unknown reason that I've never bothered to fix since it requires faxing documentation or some such nonsense.

4lukeprog11y

Thanks for letting me know. Will you please email malo@intelligence.org and see if he can help?

1ShardPhoenix11y

Ok.

[-]Rukifellth11y30

I wonder, if this community has the allegiance of at least 100 rationalists in the 80th percentile for rationality, how much money could be raised if all of them tried to form separate start-ups as feeder companies for MIRI?

7Randaly11y

Two attempts to do this are Quixey and Metamed. Quixey is notable for being the only for-profit institution to support MIRI; both groups' individual employees have also donated notable sums.

6somervta11y

Your Quixey link goes to metamed.

2Rukifellth11y

I grinned at how the two at the bottom seem to have donated just enough to be mentioned. Quixey hasn't been able to pump in as much as I expected though.

6Benya11y

There are two donors which have donated $5,000 (just enough to be mentioned), three which have donated $10,000, one which has donated $15,000, and one which has donated $25,000, which suggests "people like donating such that their total is a multiple of $5,000" as a strong competing hypothesis.

2Rukifellth11y

Touche

Moderation Log