I oppose your influence in this context for the aforementioned reasons.
However, when a claim is plausibly intended to be a hyperbolic version of a reasonable claim,
The point that you think is reasonable is still a straw man.
The point that you think is reasonable is still a straw man.
It would help me to understand why my version is a straw man if you would steel-man it. Then I could compare your steel man to my straw man and better feel the force of your criticism. (I certainly wouldn't take you to be supporting my straw man, which seemed to be your earlier concern.)
As it stands, I am puzzled by your accusation because Eric Raymond said, "Let’s drive away people unwilling to adopt that 'git’r'done' attitude with withering scorn ...". Why is it a straw man to ch...
Another month has passed and here is a new rationality quotes thread. The usual rules are: