Sure. But by definition they are irrational kludges made by human brains.
Bayesian updating is a theorem of probability: it is literally the formal definition of "rationally changing your mind." If you're changing your mind through something that isn't Bayesian, you will get the right answer iff your method gives the same result as the Bayesian one; otherwise you're just wrong.
But by definition they are irrational kludges made by human brains.
The original point was that human brains are not all Bayesian agents. (Specifically, that they could be completely certain of something)
Another month has passed and here is a new rationality quotes thread. The usual rules are: