I don't know about the rest of the people who downvoted you on this post, but I will explain my downvote:

Your charge of "groupthink" does not hold water because Less Wrong is a community for people who take on logic and "rationality" as a foundation for viewing and thinking about the world. Hence, when you say:

"i am reading nothing substantial"

what you really mean to say is:

"I don't know what you guys are talking about because I haven't read most of the core content on the site."

So what can we say, really, that you won't reject out of hand as being "groupthink"? But based on this criteria, if you were trying to be consistent you would have to shout "groupthink!" at every single organization or community whose members had similar beliefs and behaviors that were somewhat cryptic for outsiders (including all religious congregations and organizations, obviously).

As for your demand for:

1. sources 2. methodology 3. that concludes Jesus Christ did not rise from the dead and is not of God.

It's an absurd request and you are incorrect in making it. I'm not going to explain why, because there is too much inferential distance between us. If you actually want to understand why and what I'm talking about, you're going to have to do a lot of reading, starting with The Simple Truth and the sequences.

Barring that though, most people here will not be interested in engaging your comments.

my opinion is that it is here that results are predetermined and evidence and method made to support pre-determined [desired] outcomes.

Are you referring to something specific you've seen in our way of doing things, or just assuming that since we disagree with you we must be doing something wrong?

I have observed and found that human evolution forever problem solves, only to find temporary solutions, new found errors, and omissions, revealing yet another problem. this feedback loop will never cease.

If you mean evolution in a literal sense, of course, that's how evolution works - and it's a feature, not a flaw, since it allows species to avoid getting stuck in a local maximum rather than finding the best configuration for their environment. That's entirely irrelevant to the rest of your comment, though, so I expect that's not what you mean.

If you're using 'evolution' to mean 'thought', please don't. It's incredibly annoying.

However, if a relationship in Christ through faith can increase the likelihood of one's success in these and any other pursuit.....you have the free will and intellect to find any and every answer upon your own discovery and learning processes.

We've actually discussed that, on more than one occasion.

Theists don't have any observable advantage over non-theists on matters of chance. God doesn't rig the dice for you.

In every properly-conducted study - and note that we're using the same definition of 'properly-conducted' there as we do everywhere else, and it doesn't involve looking at the results and seeing if we agree - prayer has been found to make no difference to things with objective outcomes. It does have some interesting and useful effects on emotional state, in some situations, but those can be achieved just as well through brief, secular meditation.

There are significant advantages to belonging to a social group like a church, but those advantages are social, not theistic - equivalent benefits can be gained by belonging to many other kinds of social groups, if one lives in an area that's not hostile to non-theists. If one is in an area or situation that's hostile to non-theists, it may indeed be clearly better to profess belief in God, to avoid being ostracized - but that's not significant evidence that belief in God is useful outside of that kind of situation, and no evidence that God actually exists.

will you find incomprehensible knowledge

Ingenious!

(Even if you haven't already succeeded in that, at least you have certainly found an incomprehensible writing style.)