gwern comments on Interesting new Pew Research study on American opinions about radical life extension - Less Wrong

10 [deleted] 09 August 2013 05:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (21)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 09 August 2013 07:46:47PM *  24 points [-]

Public discussions of life extension suffer from the confusion between two possible meanings of it.

The first meaning is to just postpone death. Maybe at 90 you don't remember anything any more, the list of your chronic diseases doesn't fit on a page, you require round-the-clock care and semi-permanent sedation, take 37 different pills and need a trip to the hospital weekly -- but by golly! we can and will keep you alive for ten years more and as medicine progresses we'll keep you alive for twenty years more.

The second meaning is to postpone senescence. You're 90, but you look like a 60-year-old. You're mobile, active, with most of your mind intact, with a functioning immune system and ability to enjoy life.

I feel these scenarios are rather different. In particular, they lead to different answers to questions about whether life extension is worth it.

Comment author: gwern 09 August 2013 08:07:03PM *  5 points [-]

Yes, this is a common suggestion; the first one is called the 'Tithonus fallacy' or error by proponents of the second (see for example the fightaging.org links I posted).