= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
MugaSofer comments on What Bayesianism taught me - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (201)
I am confused. So if you DON'T "encounter the thing in a way that is overwhelming evidence for its existence" then you have evidence against its existence?
That doesn't seem reasonable to me.
Under the technical definition of "evidence", yes. In practice, it's a question of how likely you would be to have seen one by now if they were real.