= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
MugaSofer comments on Humans are utility monsters - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (213)
Utilitarianism doesn't say that. Maybe some variant says that, but general utilitarianism merely says that I should have a single self-consistent utility function of my own, which is free to assign whatever weights to others.
ETA: PhilGoetz says otherwise. I believe that he is right, he's an expert in the subject matter. I am surprised and confused.
"Utilitarianism" is sometimes used for both that "variant" (valuing utility) and the meaning you ascribe to it (defining "value" in terms of utility.) The Utility Monster is designed to interfere with the former meaning. Which is the correct meaning ...