heredami comments on Open thread, August 19-25, 2013 - Less Wrong

2 Post author: David_Gerard 19 August 2013 06:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (325)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 August 2013 10:41:23AM *  2 points [-]

I have never consciously noticed a dust speck going into my eye, at least I don't remember it. This means it didn't make big enough effect on my mind so that it would have made a lasting impression on my memory. When I first read the post about dust specks and torture, I had to think hard about wtf the speck going into your eye even means.

Does this mean that I should attribute zero negative utility to dust speck going into my eye?

Comment author: gwern 25 August 2013 02:42:56PM 3 points [-]

Does this mean that I should attribute zero negative utility to dust speck going into my eye?

You could consider the analogous problem of waking up during surgery & then forgetting it afterwards.

Comment author: Locaha 25 August 2013 10:58:32AM 2 points [-]

The dust speck is just a symbol for the smallest negative utility unit. Just imagine something else.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 August 2013 12:34:20PM 2 points [-]

Oh, I was already aware of that (and this is not just hindsight bias, I remember reading about this today and someone suggested replacing the speck with the smallest actual negative utility unit). This isn't really about the original question anyway. I was just thinking if something that doesn't even register on a conscious level could have negative utility.

Comment author: Locaha 26 August 2013 06:58:14AM 1 point [-]

I was just thinking if something that doesn't even register on a conscious level could have negative utility.

I guess anything with a negative cumulative effect.

Imagine the dust specks piling in your eye until they start to interfere with your vision.

Comment author: linkhyrule5 29 August 2013 10:38:14AM 1 point [-]

Well, yes, but it's one dust speck per person...

And it's entirely possible that utility of dust speck isn't additive. In fact, it's trivially so: one dust speck is fine, a few trillion will do gruesome things to your head.

Comment author: Locaha 29 August 2013 11:24:47AM 0 points [-]

I'm now thinking of developing a Dust Speck Machine Gun. Or Shotgun, possibly.

Well, yes, but it's one dust speck per person...

Well, I don't see how anything that never registers on any level can have any utility.

But... I dunno. Something that lowers your IQ by 1 point may be something you will never discover, and yet it will cause you negative utility...