the-citizen comments on Outside View(s) and MIRI's FAI Endgame - Less Wrong

16 Post author: Wei_Dai 28 August 2013 11:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (60)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: the-citizen 20 October 2014 04:35:04AM *  0 points [-]

OK fair comment, although I note that the genetic approach doesn't (and imo shouldn't) only consider the welfare of humans, but also other species. Human genetics would probably have to be the starting point for prioritising them though, otherwise we might end with a FAI governing a planet of plankton or something.

While I'm quite interested in the potential of things like wearable tech and cyborgism, I feel we ought to be fairly cautious with the gene side of things, because the unintentional potential for fashion eugenics, branching off competing species etc. I feel existential risk questions have to come first even if that's not always the fun option. I see what you're saying though, and I hope we find a way to have our cake and eat it too if possible.

Comment author: ChristianKl 20 October 2014 01:45:19PM 0 points [-]

Human genetics would probably have to be the starting point for prioritising them though, otherwise we might end with a FAI governing a planet of plankton or something.

Plankton doesn't have what we consider consciousness. That's why that goal is in the mission statement.

I feel we ought to be fairly cautious with the gene side of things, because the unintentional potential for fashion eugenics, branching off competing species

Given that you aren't the only person who thinks that way Western countries might indeed be cautious but that doesn't mean that the same goes for East Asia or entrepreneurs in Africa.