= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
patrickmclaren comments on A basis for pattern-matching in logical uncertainty - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (18)
I'm kind of confused. Did we really mean odds or primes? If we told the robot that this statement was true for the N integers, shouldn't we have said it correctly? If we did mean primes, then could at least have been honest, and said '2, 3, 5, 7'.
Oh, whoops. I'll fix that to make it more ambiguous. :)
Anyhow, it doesn't matter what we meant - what was communicated to the robot was "a property shared by 3, 5, 7 that can be tested for in 14 characters." The robot doesn't really understand English labels.