Vaniver comments on Probability, knowledge, and meta-probability - Less Wrong

38 Post author: David_Chapman 17 September 2013 12:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: David_Chapman 14 September 2013 11:13:07PM *  1 point [-]

I'm sure you know more about this than I do! Based on a quick Wiki check, I suspect that formally the A_p are one type of hyperprior, but not all hyperpriors are A_p (a/k/a metaprobabilities).

Hyperparameters are used in Bayesian sensitivity analysis, a/k/a "Robust Bayesian Analysis", which I recently accidentally reinvented here. I might write more about that later in this sequence.

Comment author: Vaniver 14 September 2013 11:24:33PM *  5 points [-]

When you use an underscore in a name, make sure to escape it first, like so:

I suspect that formally the A\_p are one type of [hyperprior](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperprior), but not all hyperpriors are A\_p (a/k/a metaprobabilities).

(This is necessary because underscores are yet another way to make things italic, and only applies to comments, as posts use different formatting.)

Comment author: David_Chapman 15 September 2013 02:35:23AM 1 point [-]

Thanks! Fixed.