= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
philh comments on Probability and radical uncertainty - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (71)
At least one of the top-level headings should be a catch-all "None of the above", which represents your estimated probability that you left something out.
The probability assigned to "none of the above" should be smaller than your probability that you left something out, since "none of the above is true" is a strict subset of "I left out a possibility".
(It's possible I misinterpreted you, so apologies if I'm stating the obvious.)