Jiro comments on I attempted the AI Box Experiment again! (And won - Twice!) - Less Wrong

36 Post author: Tuxedage 05 September 2013 04:49AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (163)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Jiro 04 October 2013 03:54:59PM -1 points [-]

The reason having script was so important to my strategy was because I relied on methods involving rapid-fire arguments and contradictions against the Gatekeeper whilst trying to prevent him from carefully considering them. A game of logical speed chess, if you will. This was aided by the rule which I added: That Gatekeepers had to respond to the AI.

When someone says that the gatekeeper has to respond to the AI, I would interpret this as meaning that the gatekeeper cannot deliberately ignore what the AI says--not that the gatekeeper must respond in a fixed amount of time regardless of how much time it takes for him to process the AI's argument. If the AI says something that the gatekeeper legitimately needs to take a lot of time to understand and respond to, I would think that the spirit of the rules allows the gatekeeper to take as much time as is necessary.