= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Metus comments on Open thread, September 9-15, 2013 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (126)
I sympathize.... but finding all the good stuff is hard enough now and I certainly don't succeed at it. What happens when there are ten times as many posters?
Reddit tries hard, but I don't spend much time there because the volume is so overwhelming.
It seems like a winner-take-all problem in the comments to me. As LW sorts submissions by date and not by reddit's algorithm it is no problem to see valuable posts by their upvotes. In the comments however posts are sorted by votes and here winner-takes-all comes into play as most people only read the first couple of posts and late-comers drown out.
Above the top-level comment box, there's an option to sort comments by date. Perhaps that should be the default.