Stuart_Armstrong comments on Scientific Evidence, Legal Evidence, Rational Evidence - Less Wrong

37 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 August 2007 05:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (14)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 20 August 2007 03:58:55PM 1 point [-]

To the extent it constitutes legal evidence, it may be less believable precisely because this give police commissioners power that they may be exercising in corrupt and power-hungry ways.

You need to consider costs as well. The cost of a legal statment is much higher, in that the commissioner faces perjury charges if he utters a lie in court. But most importantly of all, is expected to back up his statement with solid evidence or a solid story of how he came to believe that X is a kingpin (both of which increase the chance of him being found out, if he is indeed lying).