Lumifer comments on [LINK] Larry = Harry sans magic? Google vs. Death - Less Wrong

23 Post author: shminux 18 September 2013 04:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Lumifer 18 September 2013 08:40:58PM 0 points [-]

There is a serious lack of details. Essentially all that's been said is that Google will throw money at the problem. Well... I don't have high expectations that this will be a game-changer.

Comment author: RobbBB 19 September 2013 06:07:39AM 14 points [-]

This is a good sign not because money-throwing is sufficient, but because it's necessary.

Comment author: kurokikaze 19 September 2013 11:44:18AM 4 points [-]

Google have processing power backed by trained engineers, which might be important too. Google can do things like "Folding@home" on their own.

Comment author: MugaSofer 20 September 2013 06:58:59AM 4 points [-]

Anti-aging researchers talk a lot about how they could do so much more with proper funding. I mean, they would say that, but that doesn't mean it isn't true - after all, the odds that the optimal amount of funding was that small is ... small.

Also, Google bring credibility and, perhaps, greater competence/strategy at approaching moonshots.