Coscott comments on The Belief Signaling Trilemma - Less Wrong

8 Post author: Coscott 20 September 2013 12:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (48)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Coscott 20 September 2013 02:25:31AM 1 point [-]

I absolutely agree that if this model is correct, it is mostly subconscious, and the solutions I suggested were from a very non-human agent standpoint, but I think the 3 solutions are all possible even for humans, especially in an online community.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 20 September 2013 08:35:36AM 6 points [-]

A fourth option, online community specific, could be something like this: Allow members to post their comments anonymously, under following conditions:

Only users with enough karma can post anonymously. (This is to prevent abuse by trolls.) You pay some karma for posting anonymously, which is a constant number not depending on whether people agree with you or disagree with you. (To prevent abuse by serious members.) If you comment anonymously again in the thread below your original anonymous comment, you don't pay karma again, and the website shows that this is the same anonymous person, for example by using "Anonymous#1". (So for example people can ask for clarifications and you can explain freely.)

The anonymous comments can also be upvoted and downvoted, and hidden if they get too much downvoted, but their karma is not reflected on their user. Also, the social effect is that other people don't know who you are, even if they downvote you.

I don't know how much useful this would be. The feeling of being downvoted could still be unpleasant. But it would be some balance between the ability to write anonymously, and possible troll abuse.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 20 September 2013 01:42:30PM 1 point [-]

Can't pretty much anybody comment anonymously with the system as it is, without the automatic karma penalty but otherwise behaving as above, by creating an account called "anonymous#1" (or whatever version of that hasn't been taken, or "sockpuppet17", or whatever)?

Sure, if it's too far downvoted the comment will be hidden and the account silenced, but the comment has still been made anonymously. And granted, this doesn't allow for a continuing conversation if the initial comment is heavily downvoted, but I think that's considered a feature here.

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 20 September 2013 02:48:39PM 4 points [-]

I considered making a throwaway recently, but account setup now requires email verification, and I'm sufficiently paranoid that this was enough of an obstacle to stop me from doing so.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 21 September 2013 08:14:48PM *  0 points [-]

Given how easy it is to create throw away (Edit: e-mail) accounts, this is a trivial inconvenience.

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 21 September 2013 08:15:54PM 2 points [-]

Can you explain what you're trying to express with this comment?

Comment author: Adele_L 22 September 2013 12:32:05AM 4 points [-]

Something like mailinator should suffice for LW throwaway anonymity.