= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
lessdazed comments on Science as Attire - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (84)
What evidence could I observe that would lower my probability that I remember a stimulus?
If an angry empty crack pipe demands you stop daydreaming, then it should be thought more likely than before that the memory isn't of something that really happened.
If you are thinking that you are thinking of something, you could be wrong. Thinking the thought "Mouse" is what it feels like to think of a mouse, thinking "I'm thinking of a mouse" is what it feels like to think of thinking of a mouse.
If you can demonstrate that I can be wrong about thinking I'm thinking something I'll retract my OP.
Of course that I remember the appearance of the crack pipe, does not need for it to be that there was a crack pipe.