lmm comments on Does the simulation argument even need simulations? - Less Wrong

7 Post author: lmm 11 October 2013 09:16PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (102)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lmm 11 October 2013 10:48:45PM 0 points [-]

The Numerical Platonist's construct is just the universe itself again. No problem there.

Why? If it's just because the computations come out the same, doesn't that mean any simulation of the universe is also just the universe itself again?