there is currently insufficient evidence to make strong claims about the nature or magnitude of any supposed behavioral differences.
I think there's a large amount of sufficient evidence to make strong claims about IQ differences.
It should be thought of as a value, not as a fact.
Yes, it should, but in reality gender equality is often treated as equality of capability.
I think there's a large amount of sufficient evidence to make strong claims about IQ differences.
Genetically based differences, not differences in general. Epigenetics and environmental factors obviously create huge differences.
gender equality is often treated as equality of capability.
Obviously, capability is not equal across all domains. The only thing which remains controversial is which domains the differences exist in, and to what extent these differences are genetic.
People want to tell everything instead of telling the best 15 words. They want to learn everything instead of the best 15 words. In this thread, instead post the best 15-words from a book you've read recently (or anything else). It has to stand on its own. It's not a summary, the whole value needs to be contained in those words.
I'll start in the comments below.
(Voted by the Schelling study group as the best exercise of the meeting.)