Jiro comments on A Voting Puzzle, Some Political Science, and a Nerd Failure Mode - Less Wrong

88 Post author: ChrisHallquist 10 October 2013 02:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (180)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jiro 28 December 2015 07:04:26AM *  1 point [-]

If, off the top of your head, you thought of a solution to a problem that's existed for hundreds of years and had lots of smart people look at it, it probably was thought up by someone else already and found wanting.

Ranking is subject to Arrow's impossibility theorem.

Having voters assign candidates a score is still covered by the Gibbert-Satterthwaite theorem.

Comment author: gjm 28 December 2015 10:42:57AM *  0 points [-]

According to Warren "Range Voting" Smith, Gibbard-Satterthwaite only applies when what voters provide is a ranking rather than a scoring.

[EDITED to put the link on a slightly better choice of words.]

Comment author: dimension10 28 December 2015 08:11:31AM 0 points [-]

Yeah, sorry, I don't know what I was thinking.