= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
AspiringRationalist comments on Creating a Text Shorthand for Uncertainty - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (29)
Why do we need a shorthand? We already have a clear way to express uncertainty (98% sure).
If you could get past the bootstrap problem, it'd be used more than the existing version, simply due to being faster to type. ~c2
There is the issue of fitting it into existing grammatical rules, but that's not strictly speaking required.